11/27/2023 0 Comments Does instagram compress imagesThis new app is actually a genius move on Meta’s part and it’s now clear: Instagram is for video, Threads is for photography.Prasham Parikh is a freelancer at Android Police, and you can catch him writing how-to guides, features, and reviews on smartphones or pretty much anything that has a battery in it. Right now, I want to spend time in Threads in a way that I don’t with its sister app – a so-called ‘photography’ app, as I've mentioned – or with Twitter. I like Threads now, though I’m cautious as to how long it will stay this way: it took Instagram many years to unravel for photographers, and Threads piggybacks Insta, and its growth curve is already rapid, and that’s potentially bad news – it could be like milk left out in the sun. Threads feels like a fresh start new connections and communities are being formed, and I can share photos how I want. As for Twitter, I’ve never really used it for sharing photos there are too many limitations, plus, I wasn’t engaged in photo communities in the same way as on Insta. The waters muddied a long time ago, and TechRadar published an article exploring why Instagram is broken for photographers back in 2021. After its Meta-fication, human engagement decreased, and ads appeared, uninvited. I was an early adopter of Instagram – it was the first real outlet for me to share photos, and gave extra meaning to my creative endeavors.īut as the Instagram app evolved I became less involved. It’s early days, and I’m interested to see how this will play out, but I want to be optimistic. Curate your connections, and let real conversations begin. The following may sound corny, even lofty, but Threads is a chance to start again. It's also a shared feeling among many photographers and users in general that too much engagement on Twitter is. There are workarounds to help you curate what you see in Insta, but it’s another process to deploy. Instagram is pushing ads, which are nowhere to be found on Threads… for now. No auto-rotate aside, though, it's so far, so good, and Threads is already going some way to appeasing serious photographers.īeyond the capacity to showcase your photos adequately, it's become increasingly harder to engage in meaningful conversations around photography on Instagram, and even Twitter. I’d expect something like that to be fixed, but it's worth flagging. There are early image limitations in Threads, however, like how landscape photos don’t rotate when you turn your phone horizontal. Initial signs with Threads suggest that less compression is being applied to photos than on Twitter – you can pinch zoom and there’s still plenty of sharp detail there. Of course, looking at a photo on a smartphone isn’t the best way to enjoy photography at the best of times, but compression further reduces image sharpness. Threads is a no fuss photo sharing app right now.Īggressive compression also limits viewers from enjoying images at their full resolution. ![]() Even 16:9 videos flipped to a portrait format 9:16 are displayed with no top / bottom crop, and no messing around with third-party apps. I’ve seen 2:3 photos, and photo carousels in mixed aspect ratios, all displayed in full. ![]() Third-party apps are a workaround, whereby you add a border to the sides of your 2:3 images to create a 3:4 ratio, or you can bite the bullet and crop into the top or bottom. If you shoot in portrait format, you lose detail from the top or bottom of your photo. Twitter and Instagram cannot accommodate this format, being limited to a 3:4 aspect ratio. Most pro camera sensors have a 3:2 aspect ratio which flipped to portrait format is 2:3. ![]() Serious photographers who use social media platforms like Instagram and Twitter to grow their business are hamstrung for various reasons, and one of those surrounds the limitations the platforms impose on how photos are presented.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |